Self-Centered Aging versus Selfless Aging
When I was a teenager stepping slowly into adulthood, I often wondered what truly happens when one becomes old. Life, as I observed it, appeared to follow a fixed and relentless trajectory—education, job, marriage, family, possessions. Alongside this ran an unspoken but powerful current of comparison: first with classmates and colleagues, later with cousins, siblings, and finally with those closest to us. The race never paused. There was no finish line, only shifting reference points.
During this long and breathless run, I held onto a quiet
hope. I believed that with age and experience, people would eventually see the
futility of endlessly amassing wealth and status. I imagined that maturity
would bring a widening of vision—that people would recognize real wealth in
humane relationships, empathy, and a deeper connection with the world beyond
themselves.
What I witnessed instead was deeply unsettling.
Many of those I observed—people entering their sixties,
seventies, eighties, and even nineties—did not grow more open or expansive.
Quite the opposite. Their world began to shrink. Their emotional universe
narrowed to their own children and grandchildren,that too selective, and often even that circle
was governed by control, possession, and expectation rather than generosity.
The curiosity for life, society, and humanity at large seemed to recede. This
reversal shocked me. It dismantled assumptions I had quietly carried for years
and filled me with an unexpected fear about my own old age.
This experience stood in stark contrast to what Bertrand Russell so beautifully described about aging:
“Make your interests gradually wider and more impersonal,
until bit by bit the walls of the ego recede, and your life becomes
increasingly merged in the universal life.
An individual human existence should be like a river—small
at first, narrowly contained within its banks, and rushing passionately past
rocks and over waterfalls. Gradually the river grows wider, the banks recede,
the waters flow more quietly, and in the end, without any visible break, they
become merged in the sea, and painlessly lose their individual being.”
Instead of widening, interests become narrower. Instead of
ego dissolving, it becomes more rigid and inflated. Instead of merging with
life, existence contracts. Old age, which should have been a calm widening into
wisdom, often resembles a drying pond—still, stagnant, enclosed, burdened with
ego and self-centeredness. The river does not meet the sea; it evaporates in
isolation.
This raises a deeply troubling question: why does aging,
which should soften us, often harden us instead? Is it fear—of irrelevance, of
death, of loss of control? Is it a lifetime spent equating self-worth with
accumulation and comparison, leaving nothing else to fall back on when the body
weakens? Or is it society itself, which glorifies productivity and possession
but offers no moral or emotional education for letting go?
If aging does not teach us humility, compassion, and
universality, then what is it teaching us at all?
This quiet transformation—from striving youth to self-centred
old age—feels like a tragedy not just for individuals, but for humanity itself.
Elders should have been our bridges to wisdom, our living reminders of
impermanence and grace. Instead, many become prisoners of their own shrinking
identities.
What is happening to this beautiful world, and to its most
reflective phase of life?
And more importantly—how do we ensure that our own river
does not dry up before it meets the sea?
Comments
Post a Comment